Home
This site is intended for healthcare professionals
Advertisement

Remote breakout room

Share
Advertisement
Advertisement
 
 
 

Summary

This on-demand teaching session is an interactive opportunity for medical professionals to learn more about analyzing and interpreting medical research. Through a critical analysis of actual studies, professionals can gain a better understanding of how to question facts, interpret conflicting conclusions, and adapt strategies for particular medical cases. At the end of the session, attendees will be able to ask any remaining questions and be provided a link with follow-up information. This is the perfect chance for medical professionals to bolster their knowledge and provide better medical care.

Generated by MedBot

Description

First In-Course Assessment coming up? Imperial College London Medical Education Society is delighted to host our ICA 1: Written Assessment Talk where we give you guidance, tips and tricks on how to tackle your first BSc ICA.

The event will begin at 7pm on the 17th of October, with Joshua Killilea and Chhavi Nashier giving you a comprehensive run-through of the ICA. The talk will finish with a breakout room Q&A, where you will be able to join your BSc-specific Q&A for individual advice.

Slides will be accessible to all attendees immediately after the talk and it will be recorded and uploaded for viewing.

Learning objectives

Learning Objectives:

  1. Understand the differences between a review and a consultation.
  2. Critically analyse research papers and compare conflicting conclusions.
  3. Describe strategies for developing a medical recommendation in response to conflicting information.
  4. Identify common medical conditions related to altitude travel.
  5. Discuss the implications of relearning Electronic Health Records.
Generated by MedBot

Similar communities

View all

Similar events and on demand videos

Advertisement
 
 
 
                
                

Computer generated transcript

Warning!
The following transcript was generated automatically from the content and has not been checked or corrected manually.

I'm not going to always have that. Well, it really put them back. Yes. You're always gonna have the correct data you want from the, um, from the electronic health records. You know what I mean? Yeah. So that's that's what it means by caveat. Caveats Are those warnings, but, yes, you have to identify caveats. Really? Well, um, in the research also, it says question the facts. Okay, so you don't want to regurgitate facts? Um, there's no There's no point seeing the study found this this for this study found that this study found something else that's just listing the studies. That's like a review. A consultation makes use of the findings and adapts it to the particular situation. Which is you traveling to the every base camp, right. So you want to maybe have some studies that have conflicting conclusions? Okay, so let's say so. My paper was about arrhythmias, okay? And one paper says you, too. Everything okay? Yeah, but you're breaking up a lot. Sorry. Ok, let me know if you're breaking up. Yeah, I've lost, like, 10 seconds. It's okay now. Yeah. Okay. So you want to, um what I'm saying? You want to question the facts. Okay, So you may have You may have a study that makes one conclusion, but you may have another study that makes a slightly different conclusion, and then it makes it more difficult for you to come to recommendation. You understand what I mean? Yeah. So you want to make sure that you can discuss the conflicting conclusions? Okay. Say that this paper says this about this paper says that and that is, in some way a critical sort of analysis of the papers. Okay, so what you could do is you can make one of the strategies more suitable for your case rather than the other. Okay, so you have this information, but something else is still not clear. That's fine. Yeah. Asked me. Ask you some questions in, like particularly for your case or anything, because I've been just talking at you and just go through your head. Um, So, for example, right. So for my one, a couple of, like, looked at, like, four different papers, right? So, for example, the one of the papers I was kind of critique on was a study done in South Asia. Yeah, basically concluded that in altitude travel. The most commonest hospital mission was exacerbation of P u D right. What was that again? Uh, exacerbation of peptic ulcer disease. Okay, so that's that's a common reason. Yes, but then I also my critical and, uh, also a state stuff. Um, the most commonest. Sorry. Stephan is breaking up a lot. So what we'll do is after the session finishes, I'll call you on something else. Yeah, I can do it. Doesn't sound. Can Yes. I'll call you on teams afterwards because I think I'm open till 7. 15. Here. It's only 8. 15. This channel is open till 8. 15. I can make a team school because it's very The system is very lucky. But can you hear me right now? I'm here right now. Okay, fine. Uh, what you can do is you can jump off the call. I'll wait for, like, three minutes for anyone else who wants to come speak to me to wait. And then afterwards, I'll be leaving anyway. And then, um, I'll send the teams linked to you a bit. Hi. Did the person who's asking questions leave? Yes. So I was going to meet him afterwards, actually, because we find it hard on the platform to talk each other, so I'll meet him again afterwards. But I'm staying here for the the end, just in case. And one appears. That's very sweet of you. You're welcome to leave at any point if you feel like no one's coming. Yeah, I'll wait for a couple minutes and then if anyone's to thank you so much. This is, like, brilliant having you guys, and you are all very prompt. Um so really? Thank you so much. You're welcome. It's just very valuable for us. You know, It's quite stressful as you will. You will know, obviously, but yeah, you're welcome to leave in a few minutes and have a lovely evening if I don't take care.