MedAll App
Download the MedAll App
All your healthcare resources in one place
All your healthcare resources in one place
Install Find out more
Home

A taste of presenting virtually at the 68th BAPS

Share
 
 
 

Summary

This presentation will focus on a recent study showing how common inflammatory markers can be used to accurately diagnose pediatric acute appendicitis and distinguish between complicated and uncomplicated cases. Maria Thomas will explain the study design, statistical methodologies used, and findings, as well as demonstrate an improved diagnosis of complicated appendicitis when these markers are used in combination with clinical findings. Medical professionals will learn how to better diagnose acute appendicitis in areas where other diagnostic modalities may not be available.
Generated by MedBot

Description

WELCOME to our 68th Congress!

We are delighted that we can come to you both in person and online for our very first Hybrid Congress.

We will be using the online 'Chat' for our Q&A so please make sure you are verified on MedAll. If you aren't, please email support@medall.org with the email address you have a MedAll account with and they will verify you ASAP. Or you will see a little blue circle with a 'message' in it at the bottom right of your screen- you can chat with support directly by using this.

https://congress.baps.org.uk/home/scientific-programme/keynote-speakers/

You can click on the link of the session title and this will take you through to further details about the session including abstract information for each author

Click 'play' on the main stage image to gain live access

If you need to change your ticket: please click on this help article to do this https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jvACx2BiE15MGm2aj4N0kA0l0tF2TAJm/view?usp=sharing

Schedule

Wednesday 13th July

10:00-10:10 | Opening of Congress

10:10-10:50 | Session 1 - Upper GI and Thoracic | James Andrews & Paolo De Coppi

11:00-12:40 | Session 2 - Prize Session | Paul Johnson & Amulya Saxena

12:40-13:40 | LUNCH | Please take a look at our Posterhall and Sponsors we also have some Coffee Break sessions for our online delegates to Network

13:40-14:10 | Storz Lecture - Professor Dariuz Patkowski | Mr Munther Haddad

14:10-15:05 | Session 3 - HPB | Evelyn Ong & Mikko Pakarinen

15:10-15:30 | Denis Browne Award

15:30-16:00 | COFFEE BREAK | Please take a look at our Posterhall and Sponsors we also have some Coffee Break sessions for our online delegates to Network

16:00-16:55 | Session 4 - Lower GI | Joe Curry & Victoria Lane

17:00-18:00 | Poster Presentation: Top 15 Posters | This is a fast paced session in which poster presenters have 1 minute to present their poster and 2 minutes to answer questions from the audience, live and virtual!

Thursday 14th July

09:00-10:10 | Session 5 - Urology | Liam McCarthy & Caroline McDonald

10:10-10:50 | COFFEE BREAK | Please take a look at our Posterhall and Sponsors we also have some Coffee Break sessions for our online delegates to Network

10:50-11:20 | Storz Urology Lecture - Professor Rowan Parks | Liam McCarthy

11:20-12:05 | Session 6 - General | Dhanya Mullassary & Clare Rees

12:05-13:15 | LUNCH | Please take a look at our Posterhall and Sponsors we also have some Coffee Break sessions for our online delegates to Network

13:15-14:45 | Urology Symposium - the current state of the art in Robotic Paediatric Urology in the UK: what is the future?

14:45-15:15 | COFFEE BREAK | Please take a look at our Posterhall and Sponsors we also have some Coffee Break sessions for our online delegates to Network

15:15-15:45 | JPS Lecture - Marc Levitt | Patient Driven Change, Is collaborative care the future of medicine?

15:45-17:30 | BSPGHAN and BAPS Session - State of the Art Management of Intestinal Failure

15:45-17:15 | PARALLEL SESSION - Trainees Session | Miss Janet McNally & Jejunal Interposition | Free Papers Mr Milind Kulkarni - MCR/ exams/ new curriculum

Friday 15th July

09:00-10:00 | Session 7 - Global Health | Yatin Patel & Kali Vardarajan

10:00-10:30 | Hugh Greenwood Lecture - Professor Simone Abib

10:30-11:00 | COFFEE BREAK | Please take a look at our Posterhall and Sponsors we also have some Coffee Break sessions for our online delegates to Network

11:00-12:10 | Session 8 - Trauma and Oncology | Alistair Dick & Erica Makin

11:30-13:00 | International Forum | Mr Mohamed Shalaby and Mr Haitham Dagash

12:10-12:55 | Session 9 - General | Sonia Basson & Kate Bradshaw

12:55-13:55 | LUNCH | Please take a look at our Posterhall and Sponsors we also have some Coffee Break sessions for our online delegates to Network

13:55-14:25 | Mason Brown Lecture - David Nott

14:25-15:40 | Session 10 - General | Ceri Jones & Ashish Minocha

15:40-15:45 | Close and Prizes

15:45-17:00 | AGM for BAPS Members

Learning objectives

Learning Objectives: 1. Describe the purpose of the study on common inflammatory markers directing therapy in pediatric acute appendicitis. 2. Evaluate the correlation between inflammatory markers and complicated appendicitis. 3. Analyze the results of the regression logistic regression model and formulate a regression equation 4. Estimate cut-off values for individual inflammatory markers for improved diagnosis of complicated appendicitis. 5. Examine the potential of a combination of inflammatory markers to direct non-operative management in resource scarce areas.
Generated by MedBot

Related content

Similar communities

Sponsors

View all

Similar events and on demand videos

Computer generated transcript

Warning!
The following transcript was generated automatically from the content and has not been checked or corrected manually.

The next presentation is by maria thomas talking about common inflammatory markers in directing therapy and pediatric acute appendicitis. Thank you um good morning greetings from live bianna india, so we will be presenting a study on common inflammatory markets directing therapy in pediatric acute appendicitis, done in two general hospitals in India and Oman. We have, we have no disclosures. We classified at acute appendicitis in the complicated and uncomplicated based on inter operative findings, supported by histopathological reports. Our objective was to um study if common inflammatory markers alone or in combination can help in distinguishing complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis. Our primary outcome was to identify distinguishing biomarkers the complicated appendicitis. We further try to establish cutoffs for these biomarkers individually and in combination, this was a five year retrospective study in two hospitals in 22 countries where the authors were working. All patient's with confirmed appendicitis who had undergone appendectomy were included in the study. These were the statistical methods used. In addition, we you used uh r. O. C. Analysis of the regression uh logistic regression model that we obtained and we we formulated a regression equation, which yielded a cut off as shown here, so the right side of the cut off um uh The right side of the uh inequality represented the cut off, whereas if the left side of the inequality exceeded the cut off, it predicted complicated appendicitis. 247 children were recruited into the study were included in the study, of which 40% were complicated. All laboratory parameters are significantly higher and complicated as compared to uncomplicated appendicitis. Uh We established cut off values for individual inflammatory markers in order to improve the diagnosis of complicated appendicitis, and as we see here, the AUC was highest for CRP, which also had the highest specificity and diagnostic accuracy. Um So then we combined uh we made a combination of various parameters and we established the, we tried to find out the AUC for a combination of all the inflammatory markers, which was found to be higher than the parameters individually, but it was comparable to CRP alone. The sensitivity to detect complicated appendicitis increased to over 70% when a combination of parameters were used now uh the combination of variables which showed a high a. U. C. Was then used in a regression multiple regression, and we found in order to find the significant predictors of complicated appendicitis, we found that neutrophils, lymphocytes, and platelets emerged as significant variables. The combination of these inflammatory parameters had an a. U. C. Which is comparable to Crp alone. The cut off, this combination of parameters been imputed in our specifically formulated regression equation gave the following uh formula and substituting the cut off values of neutrophils, lymphocytes, and platelets in this regression regression equation, and defining a cut off of greater than or equal to 1.2 increase the predicted value for complicated appendicitis, with the sensitivity of 78.4. So to conclude, CRP had the diagnostic highest diagnostic accuracy for complicated appendicitis. Are formulated regression equation with a value greater than or equal to 1.2 increase the predicted value for complicated appendicitis, and the combination was comparable to crp common biomarkers along with clinical findings may be used to try uh complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis, especially in areas where others diagnostic modalities may not be readily available like l. M. I. C. S. A combination of common by markers, especially with our regression equation has a potential to direct non operative management in areas of surgical resource scarcity. Thank you for your time and patient listening. Thank you very much, we've got some comments from Shalin nursing, which I'll rephrase as a question which is whether you use ct scans to help work out whether someone has complicated or uncomplicated appendicitis or other imaging uh. In, india, we don't use ct scan very commonly in patient's uh so most of the diagnosis was based on clinical uh criteria and findings and has this paper changed of these findings changed your management in your hospitals. Uh This was uh we just completed the paper and we need to uh uh we have uh it has decreased the number of non operative management's, decrease the number of operations uh yeah um have you looked at the specificity and sensitivity of these markers in the presence or absence of individual clinical variables. No we have not uh this is a retrospective study, so um we will be looking at it, sir, and you've talked about a number of different blood tests was monocyte count. One of the blood tests you looked at, no, we did not look at the monocyte count. We uh we looked at lymphocytes, neutrophils, and uh did not look at the monocytes. Thank you thank you very much for your presentation.