Home
This site is intended for healthcare professionals
Advertisement

Study Design - Presentation

Share
Advertisement
Advertisement
 
 
 

Description

For your reference, this is the presentation file of the first part of the AMSA Scotland critical appraisal webinar series (Study Design).

AMSA Scotland is organising a webinar series on critical appraisal to provide students with the basic skills required for critical appraisal of academic papers.

The target audience is medical students but the events are free and available to everyone.

The series consists of multiple talks and the 1st talk (Study designs) of the series will be held:

Date: 12th October 2022

Time: 6:30-7:30 pm (BST)

Speaker: Agi Jothi - She is currently a final year medical student at the University of Glasgow. She was the previous National Research Director for AMSA Scotland and has previous experiences in hosting critical appraisal workshops and journal clubs. She completed her BMedSc (Hons) Neuropharmacology in 2020 and has experiences in lab based research and research methodology. She has also been a speaker for various journal clubs and critical appraisal talks.

Similar communities

View all

Similar events and on demand videos

Computer generated transcript

Warning!
The following transcript was generated automatically from the content and has not been checked or corrected manually.

Study Designs By: Agi Jothi (MBChB 5) Presentation layout What are study designs? Why is it important to have knowledge about study desings Types of study designs What are study designs? • Framework • Set of methods • Procedures • collect data • Analyse data Why are study designs important? • High quality research • sets boundaries • Prevents blind search • Validity of resultsLevel of evidence Types of study designs • Descriptive studies (describe features of a population) • Case report • Case series • Analytical studies • Observational (no controlled intervention) • Cross-sectional study • Case-control study • Cohort study • Experimental (manipulate treatment/exposure) • Randomized controlled trials • Clinical trials • Animal trials • Cross over trials • N-of-1 trials Key terminologies • Longitudinal : dealing with • Cross-sectional: dealing with patients at > 1 point in time (i.e. patients at 1 point in time seen over days, months, years) • Retrospective: dealing with patients • Prospective: dealing with patients present and past with pre-existing in the present and future data • Explanatory: study taking place in • Pragmatic: study taking place in ideal settings; usually intervention ordinary settings; usually vs placebo; produces efficacy intervention vs standard of care; data produces effectiveness data and reflects everyday practice Case Report • Type of an observational study • Involves a single patient (n=1) • Usually not a repeated report • Prone to chance association and bias Case Series • Type of an observational study • Involves a group of patients • Useful for studying rare disease Cohort Study • Type of observational study • Involves groups • Cohort exposed to risk vs cohort not exposed to risk • Followed up to see who develops the condition (good quality records) • Prospective or follow-up study • Can measure incidence • Long time (has temporality) • Expensive • Attrition risk (drop out) Case-Control Study • Patients with a certain outcome (cases) are matched with patients without the outcome (control) • Look back to identify exposure risks (retrospective) • Useful to investigate new diseases / rare diseases • Quick • Cheap • Recall bias • Cant estimate prevalence and incidence • Eg. Group with breast cancer and without breast cancer. Participants are questioned about risk factors Cross-Sectional Study • Type of observational study • Snapshot of a population • Compare many different variables at the same time • Can estimate prevalence • Does not determine cause and effect relationship • No follow up needed • Cheap and quick collection of data • Lacks temporality (time component) Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) • Type of experimental study • Patients randomized to treatment arm and control arm • Requires ethical approval • Difficult • Time consuming • Expensive • Gold standard for studying effectiveness of treament. Crossover trial • participants do not only receive one intervention, but multiple, and the effect of the interventions are measured on the same individuals • Sequence of interventions (switch) • Requires a washout period • Assess which treatment works better • Useful when there is a lack of patients N-of 1 Trial • Type of crossover trial • Single subject • investigating the efficacy or side- effect profiles of different interventions • Useful for determining what works best for the patient • Requires a long time Audit • measuring a clinical outcome or a process, against well-defined standards set on the principles of evidence-based medicine in order to identify the changes needed to improve the quality of care. • Audit cycle: minimum 2 • Ethical approval not necessarily needed • Lots of data collection and time consuming Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis • Highest level of evidence • Systematic review • a summary of the medical literature that uses explicit and reproducible methods to systematically search, critically appraise, and synthesize on a specific issue. • Meta-analysis • quantitative, formal, epidemiological study design used to systematically assess the results of previous research to derive conclusions about that body of research. Conclusion • Study designs are a framework that has a set of methods to collect data • Important for high-quality research • The type of study design depends on the type of outcome • Observational vs experimental studiesEmail add: 2296404a@student.gla.ac.uk Next session • 22/10/22 (Saturday at 10:30-11:30 am BST) • Critical appraisal of a quantitative research paper • Why • How • Example