Home
This site is intended for healthcare professionals
Advertisement

ISCE101 CBD station

Share
Advertisement
Advertisement
 
 
 

Summary

Learn how to effectively present a medical case in a narrative manner with Yasmin Mayouf's ISCE101CBDstation session. Covering patient history, examination, investigation, and management, this teaching session is designed to sharpen your skills in case-based discussions. Topics such as the appropriate use of different investigations, evidence-based management alternatives, and patient-centered care are covered. It also incorporates social and ethical aspects in medical practice, such as dealing with capacity and consent issues, and dealing with complex scenarios such as DoLS, advance directives, and mental health act sections. Throughout the session, you will be able to interact in a structured manner, focusing on your patient's perspective, and learn the techniques to effectively communicate complex topics in the medical field. This training will not only boost your diagnostic and clinical reasoning but also help you provide safe, empathetic care to your patients. It further enhances your professionalism by upholding equality and diversity principles, focusing on safeguarding patient information and demonstrating effective communication skills.

Generated by MedBot

Description

In this teaching session, participants will learn how to structure their presentations for patient case discussions with senior clinicians, a key component of their final exam assessment. The session will cover how to organize a clear presentation, including the patient's history, clinical findings, management plan, and relevant investigations. Guidance will be provided on selecting a suitable case that highlights clinical reasoning and understanding. Strategies for addressing questions related to management, investigations, and ethical/social considerations will also be discussed.

Learning objectives

  1. At the end of the session, participants should be able to skillfully and succinctly present medical cases, focusing not only on the documented information but also on an analysis of the risks and benefits of the chosen management approach.
  2. Participants will learn how to take into account patient's capacity, consent, confidentiality, and safeguarding when presenting and discussing a case.
  3. By the end of the session, the participants should be comfortable discussing the reasons behind specific investigations done during the diagnostic process, providing appropriate differentials and discussing risk management.
  4. The participants should be capable of discussing risks versus benefits of treatment options, providing an understanding of relevant guidelines and managing complex cases with consideration of social/ethical aspects.
  5. The aim is for participants to demonstrate understanding of various social and ethical topics relevant to patient care, including capacity, consent, information retention and decision making, mental health act, and deprivation of liberty safeguards.
Generated by MedBot

Similar communities

View all

Similar events and on demand videos

Computer generated transcript

Warning!
The following transcript was generated automatically from the content and has not been checked or corrected manually.

ISCE101CBDstation By Yasmin MayoufWhatistheCBD station? Presenta case – discuss history, examination, Case baseddiscussion 7minutes topresent investigations, management. Should have a printedcopyas an aid social/ethical memoireinthe examCriteria • Maxone sideofA4, calibri size 12 font • Full name andnumberin topright handcorner • Anonymiseddata • Clear structure with headingsfor the Hx • Widely used abbreviationsare accepted (e.g.TIA, ECG) • OnlyPDF versionsallowed • New case foreach setting(formative,summative,re-sit) • assessmente.g.ptpathway/oncology/SLEscannothavebeen submittedfor apreviousQuestions • With respect to [the investigation selected], why was that particular test undertaken?’ • ‘Regarding the patient’s management [e.g. the choice of a particular drug (being started or stopped) or procedure] what do you think are the risks and benefits of this approach to the patient’s management?’ ‘Are you aware of any guidelines that support this approach/ management?’ ‘What are the key impacts of [this management plan] from the perspective of your patient?’ Takenfrom2023CBDtemplate• ‘Finally, in regard to [ethical, EDI or social science issue] what issues arose and how were they addressed?’ • ‘Are there any ethical frameworks, guidelines or principles that you encountered during the care of this patient?’ • ‘And finally, what was it about this patient that made an impact on you?’ Theymaynotask theseQs….Mark-scheme • Assessed onabilityto ‘succinctly’ present the case • Ability to consider risks/benefits of alternative Mx options using evidence based guidelines • Person-centered consultationand managementskills • Equality and diversityprinciples – pt capacity,consent, confidentiality, safeguarding.Communicationskills-process • Make eyecontact • Cohesive: PC  HPC  PMHx  DHx +allergies  SHx  differentials  Ix  final differential  MxCommunicationskills-content • Must have ethical/socialcomponent • I woulddiscuss it during the initial7 minutesbutnot inmuchdetail, otherwise youwill end up repeating yourself.Diagnosticsandclinicalreasoning • Discuss why Ix were done • Appropriate differentials with reasoning • Risk managementClinicalcare&ptsafety • Risks vs benefit • Guidelines • Managing complex cases social/ethicalProfessionalism • Empathy • Ptcentered • Social/ethicalSocial/ethicaltopics Children Refusing consentingto MHA MCA treatment treatment Communication DoLS difficulties DNACPR Whatiscapacity • Capacity – ability to make decisions for themselves. • Decision and time specific. May have capacity forsome decisions but not others. Understand Weighup information Retain risks/benefits CommunicateMentalCapacityAct • PHYSICAL HEALTH • 1. Assumecapacity • 2. Supportfirst.Help someoneas much as possibleto maketheirown decision • 3. Rightto makean‘unwise’decision • 4. Checkcapacity • 5. Ifnot proventohavecapacity, thenany decisionmustbemade intheirbest interests. • Least restrictiveinterventionDeprivationofLibertySafeguards(DoLS) Restrictingsomeone’sfreedomto keepthem safe Indications:keeppersonsafe fromharm,providingessentialcare. Personlackscapacityto consentto their care/treatment. Mustbe inperson’sbestinterest Mustbe leastrestrictiveoption Mustbe legallyauthorised– DOLSassessmentAdvanceDirectives • Advance decisionto refusetreatment • For specific treatment ina specific circumstance. • Can’t demandtreatment • Must be written down, signed by patientand awitness. • make decisionhas beenconferred too another person (Lasting Powerof Attorney), not incapacitated and can decidethemselves.DNACPR • Ultimatelya medicaldecision • Conversationshouldbe had with patient+ family ofthe decisionand signed nd • If patient disagrees withyou, 2 opinionshould be offered. • Not legally binding • Doesn’t apply if there is areversible cause – e.g. choking, anaphylaxis.Mentalhealthact Section Who Whatit does 2 Approved mental health professional+ 2 Drs Admission for assessment for up to 28days Can'tbe renewed • Mental health conditions 3 AMHP + 2Drs Admission for Tx for 6 months Canbe renewed • At risk to themselves, others OR 4 GP 72hr assessmentorder (emergencyassessment) AMHP When section 2 would be delayed refusing urgent Tx. 5(2) Dr Detainedin hospital • Canoverride mental capacity act 5(4) Nurse Detainpt for 6hrs in hospital 17a Community Recall pt to hospital for Tx if not complying • “sectioning” 135 Police Remove person in their property to place of safety 136 Police Public (6 letters for 136) place Taken to place of safety 24hrswhile mental health actassessmentarrangedGillickandFraserguidelines Fraserguidelines Gillick Competency What? Relatedtosexualhealth Child <16yrsconsidered‘Gillick Inparticular–contraceptive competent’iftheyhaveenough adviceand Txtochildren<16yrs understanding,maturityto withoutparentalinvolvement comprehendnature+ implications Considerations 1. Childunderstandsadvice 1. Childcanweighthe given risks/benefits 2. HCP can’tpersuadechildto 2. Childunderstands informparents consequencesoftheir 3. Childlikelytoengagein decisions sexual activityregardless 3. Assessabilityto 4. WithoutTx, child’s communicatereasoned physical/mentalhealthmay decision suffer 5. Txinchild’sbest interest Ifcompetent+ consents to Tx give Tx Ifcompetent+ refusesTx maybe <16yrs+ overriddenbycourt/parentsifrefusal consent risks harm Childnot competent bestinterest meetings NICE guidelines Microguide Trustguidelines Guidelines Anyroyal colleges Recommendations from trust’s microbiology Researchpapers (any)