Computer generated transcript
 Warning!
 The following transcript was generated automatically from the content and has not been checked or corrected manually. 
    NATIONAL SURGICAL
    TEACHING SOCIETY
    ABDOMINOPELVIC CT
       INTERPRETATION
Ed Neil-Gallacher
                26/9/23Ed (Neil-Gallacher)
Radiologist, Carlisle+Whitehaven (Cumbria)
Trained across southern England; Kent, Surrey, Sussex,
London+Cambridge
Cross-sectional fellowship in emergency and cardiothoracic
imaging
Likes:
-holidays
-cat videos
-radiologyKEY LEARNING OBJECTIVES
 ⮚ Image acquisition
 ⮚ Systemic approach to CT review
 ⮚ What to look for
 ⮚ Learn some key image findingsAcute CT…How we do
it…‘IRMER’ (          yawn    )
 • ‘justify’ or ‘approve’ the scan…(shortly)ulations 2017. We must first
 • Computed Tomography uses x-rays to acquire ‘slices’ through the body.
 • X-rays are emitted and traverse the body
 • The detectors opposite (on the other side of the patient) quantify the
   attenuation coefficient of the tissues they pass through
 • The density of tissue in a particular volume can be calculated
 • The slices can be added together to get an anatomical picture.Summary
• Maths.Sir Godfrey     Hounsfield
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/bmgxzg7ynfov=ih_mTjMrrb0
                                                Chose a scale that reflects the four
                                                basic x-ray densities in the body:
                                                air = -1000 HU (Hounsfield units)
                                                fat = -60 to -120 HU
                                                water = 0 HU
                                                compact bone = +1000 HUCT requests
 • Broadly - the younger the patient, the more vulnerable their tissues
   are to x-ray induced mutations (+by extension cancer)
 • We must therefore quantify the risks and benefits in each case
 • If radiology agrees it is clinically necessary to proceed to CT - rather
   than wait, do nothing or image by a different modality – then give us a
   clue!CT requests
 • Contain a brief summary that is factually true, i.e without using a trigger
   word or exaggerating to scare radiology into submission
 • Tell us the patient’s essential medical and surgical history, i.e if they’ve
   had a partial colectomy or a cholecystectomy (or whatever else) please
   write it down, as it saves us valuable time
 • Finish the request by asking us a question. It should stop us from waffling
   (I make no promises)Remember one of our maxims…Case 1
 CLINICAL INDICATION:
 ?obstruction
 right illiac fossa pain, some distention to right side, vomiting.
 ?obstruction ?ischaemic bowelAnother radiology phrase…
Fat is your friend
Look for inflammatory fat stranding  Case 1
• Cholecystitis
• Stone?
• Distension?
• Wall thickening?
• Mural hyperenhancement?
• Pericholecystic oedema?Fat strandingCholecystitis
 • Look for complications…
 • Is there a calcified stone and where is it?
 • Has the GB perforated?
 • Is there a drainable collection?
 • Is there biliary obstruction? Signs of pancreatitis?On the subject of fat…Case 2
  CLINICAL INDICATION:
  ?pancreatitis
  of free fluid suggestive of pancreatitis related to gallstones. CT-report
  advised pancreatic designated CT-imaging to investigate further. MRCP not
  tolerated due to claustrophobia. Bilirubin 19, ALP 213, ALT 268, Amylase
  initially 777 now 379. Thank youCase 2Case 2This vs thatCase 2
 • Acute pancreatitis
 • Interstitial oedematous (IEP) vs necrotising (NP)? (Revised Atlanta classification)
 • Look at pancreatic enhancement (ideally after 1 week cf oedema-related
   hypoenhancement)
 • Fluid collection?
 • Gallstones?
 • Ascites?Case 3
  CLINICAL INDICATION:
  ?INTESTINAL OBSTRUCTION
  PATIENT WITH RECURRENT VOMITING, TYMPANITIC PERCUSSION
  ABDOMINAL NOTES. ?INTESTINAL OBSTRUCTIONCase 3
• Poll O’ClockCase 3
 • SBO
 • Look for a transition point (occasionally easier said than done)
 • Free gas?
 • Wall enhancement preserved?
 • Pneumatosis intestinalis?
 • PV gas?
 • Closed loop?SB faecesCase 4
 CLINICAL INDICATION:
 ?ca primary
 patient with SOB, CTPA showed @@@@@@@@@@@@@,
 primary unknown, background breast ca /remission and baretts
 oesophagusCase 4
• PollCase 4
 • Liver metastases
 • Often silent and discovered incidentally
 • Generally hypoattenuating (can be hypervascular with some
  primaries – RCC, thyroid, neuroendocrine)
 • cf. abscesses which often present with RUQ pain and feverHhhmm? (Poll)
      A      BCase 5
 ?appendicitis 60 year old woman, started with periumbilical
 pain, fever, and nausea on friday, pain migrated to RIF on
 saturday, a/w diarrhoea and worsening pain in RIF, CRP 100,
 no prev abdominal surgeries, no known ovarian pathology,
 ?appendicitisCase 5
• EasyAppendicitis
 • Dilated > 6 mm
 • Appendicolith?
 • Mural hyperenhancement?
 • Mural congruity?
 • …fat stranding?
 • Collection?
 • Perforation?Uh-oh
• Surgeons and their complications…Case 5a
     •  Rare (developed countries). Mainly bacterial, usually in the setting of
        comorbidities
     •  Infection; abdominal sepsis
     •  Immunocompromised
     •  IVDU
     •  Trauma
     •  ERCP
     •  Biliary disease
     •  Inflammatory bowel disease
     •  PUDCase 6
 CLINICAL HISTORY
 Abdominal pain. Fresh PR bleeding. Vomiting. Weight loss.
 Peritonitis.Case 7
 • CLINICAL HISTORY
 • Trauma to the left upper quadrant. Did somersault and landed on to
  pole with impact on the left upper quadrant. Presents with left upper
  quadrant pain and pain on examination. To rule out
  thoracic/abdominal injury.Case 8
 • CT neck CT thorax CT abdomen CT pelvis/CT aorta
 • Clinical history:? Abdominal aortic aneurysm? Renal stone.. New
  onset of right lower quadrant pain with palpable pulsatile mass
  possible lower limb and ischaemic symptoms of blood in the urineSUMMARY
 • Think about the indication and determine what test would be best to
   confirm your diagnosis
 • If acute CT is indicated then in your request be concise, factual/ accurate
   (don’t exaggerate) AND tells us some useful history
 • Ask us a question so we can tailor our report (or we’re prone to wordiness)
 • If safe to do so, giving i.v contrast can be v helpful – but it is not essential
   to look for bowel obstruction, perforation, ruptured AAA etc (risk vs
   benefits)SUMMARY
 • Start with axial images (so you get used to reviewing in this plane)
 • ‘Window’ the scan to optimize the pictures, for free gas use a ‘lung
  window’
 • FAT IS YOUR FRIEND - look for fat stranding/ oedema
 • Is something looks strange look at a previous scan (Old is gold)SUMMARY
 • Be systematic
 • compare with a structure you recognize out what you’re looking at then
 Good luck!Resources
 • Google images, Radiopaedia
 • Ed.Neil-Gallacher@ncic.nhs.uk  THANK YOU!
●  QR code and survey link
●  Stay tuned for… upcoming lectures insert
   here
●  Follow the link to NSTS website for
   further learning resources
●  Promotion from sponsors
●  Feedback link/QR, example on right